CCRP Central Committee stands against the Wild Olympics Agenda and urges County Commissioners to withdraw their support
The Clallam County Republican Party Central Committee reviewed a Resolution against the Wild Olympics Campaign written and presented by Sue Forde, then unanimously passed it, urging the Clallam County Board of Commissioners to withdraw their support.
8/6/2011 – Forks panel speaks to the Wild Olympics Campaign, Reintroduction of Wolves, and UN Agenda 21
7/23/2010 – Wild Olympics program planners move forward with support of county commissioners, environmental groups
CCRP Central Committee demands withdrawal from ICLEI
The Clallam County Republican Party Central Committee reviewed a Resolution to demand that the Board of Clallam County Commissioners withdraw from ICLEI- (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives), now ICLEI- Local Governments for Sustainability. written and presented by Sue Forde, then unanimously passed it. Subsequently, Chair Dick Pilling presented it to the County Commissioners at their regular meeting. The Commission, several weeks later, decided to withdraw from ICLEI.
(ICLEI states that it promotes the UN’s “Agenda 21” and “Habitat Agenda”. Agenda 21 is the UN’s blueprint for “sustainable development”, and The Wildlands Project, which calls for radical changes away from the principles of our U.S. Constitution and State Constitutions.)
Read (and download) the booklet, “Understanding Sustainable Development – Agenda 21″.
Want to help? Educate yourself, then tell your friends and neighbors about Agenda 21.
RESOLUTION – Maintaining Our Sovereignty
The following resolution was voted upon and unanimously passed at the June 15th, 2009 Central Committee meeting.
“We, the Central Committee of the Clallam County Republican Party of the state of Washington hereby, by majority vote, resolve that our state should retain and maintain our sovereignty within the National Electoral College system and as such, should not relinquish control of our electoral votes to other American states as would be mandated by the National Popular Vote Compact.
“We see the National Popular Vote movement to be a method to institute a constitutional amendment to eliminate the Electoral College without following the constitutionally approved means to effect such amendments. We strongly support the existing constitutional amendment process and all of its time-proven safeguards.